1205. Presidential Debates for 2024

 By this time you should have heard that Biden FINALLY committed to 2 debates with President Trump. But, the playing field will be mined! Does anyone expect CNN and ABC, 1st and 2nd debate, to NOT give Joe the questions beforehand? Do you really think Biden will not rehearse the debate with those networks before the debates? Am I challenging the debate process just like many have claimed the 2020 election was rigged? I wouldn't put anything past with Tricky, Corrupt Biden and the Left Media.

Surely Trump realizes these exposures. I don't see any way ignoring these setups during the debate without claiming FOUL. 

Isn't that what we are seeing with the Trump Trials? But, there he cannot speak up because the Corrupt Judge issued a GAG order for the Defense and not the Prosecution side! FOUL? 

Justice is beyond corrupt now. Unless people wake up and realize that, no matter who they love or hate as candidates, America and Democracy is going to be dead. I am amazed that still 50% of this country can't see the downfall even now -- inflation, immigration, crime, justice, corrupt DOJ, Other corrupt agencies, Foreign affairs such as completely ignoring the Hamas terrorization of Israel, antisemitism, College indoctrination, the Corrupt Media,...whew, I need to stop and can't overlook the top-down take over of our humanity and Morales. Wake up people!

1129. How do you reduce murders by use of guns?

 Gun control laws have been argued forever! Why punish the noncriminal gun owners who have guns for protection or hunting? Can't we just create a law that makes it a mandatory death sentence for anyone convicted of murder-1? Maybe that would deter the criminal owners who usually have illegal guns, i.e., no valid ownership and/or serial numbers removed. Would this not deter some of the criminals? Why argue which guns should be banned or restricted? Just kill the killers - Mandatory death sentences.

THEN we can argue whether assault weapons should be banned/restricted. I'm all in favor of my constitutional rights to own a gun. BUT, it must be LEGAL and owned for PROTECTION or sporting use. I personally see no use for assault weapons. I personally rely and depend on law enforcement and the military for defense and protection where such weapons would be required. But, discussion can come after the above control! Hopefully that enforcement will deter assault weapons too. 

Of course people could argue why stop there. That is, why stop if just a gun is used? We already have laws for murder-1 and the states have the right to determine sentence of death or other. Let the states govern non-gun murders as they do now. Let's just make it impossible for criminals to escape a death sentence when a gun is used -- one of the easiest, quickest, and most effective ways to kill someone. How about a grenade or other explosion you ask? Or some way even worse than a gun? Then I would call that terrorism! If someone or more dies because of terrorism, I would think laws are already present to get rid of them! But, I wouldn't hesitate to add these weapons/causes to the gun mandatory sentence.

Come on legal system. We need to control this level of crime. The legal defense lawyers should not be given a crack to defend. Mandatory is mandatory...Period!

995. DOJ Election Crimes Branch and Guidelines

 Richard Pilger, the Head of the DOJ Crimes Branch resigned as per November 10, 2020 article here . Guess he didn't understand his responsibilities even though he was the editor of  "Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses", Eighth Edition, December 2017, Edited by: Richard C. Pilger, Director Election Crimes Branch Public Integrity Section presented  here and referred to as FPEO in this post.

Within his document is stated:

"Justice Department supervision over the enforcement of all criminal statutes and prosecutive theories involving corruption of the election process, criminal patronage violations, and campaign financing crimes is delegated to the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section. This Headquarters’ consultation policy is set forth in the U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEYS’ MANUAL (USAM), Section 9-85.210. In 1980, the Election Crimes Branch was created within the Public Integrity Section to manage this supervisory responsibility. The Branch is headed by a Director and staffed on a case-by-case basis with Section prosecutors experienced in handling the investigation and prosecution of election crimes."

If you note, the FPEO is an INTERNAL ONLY document that used as a guideline and not a restrictive or firmly defined process that the DOJ may take. You will also find some exceptions in the Pilger FPEO document that he also agreed with.

Sounds to me that Mr. Pilger didn't care about the Constitution and the integrity of voting as much as the Trump supporters and only in his "master piece" he created that holds no water even -- pen in one hand and sieve in other. One must challenge why he wrote such a document in the first place!